Posteo vs Tuta Comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 6.1 | 7.9 |
| Pricing |
Show billing detailsHide billing details
|
Show billing detailsHide billing details
|
| Free tier | Paid only | Limited free tierShow detailsHide details1 GB storage, 1 calendar, 3 labels, no custom domain, no extra addresses |
| Established | 2009 | 2011 |
| Platforms | Not specified | |
| Privacy | ||
| Jurisdiction | GermanyShow detailsHide detailsPosteo e.K. (a registered sole proprietorship), Methfesselstr. 38, 10965 Berlin. Registered at the Handelsregister Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRA 47592 B. Founded and owned by Patrik and Sabrina Löhr, self-financed with no external investors or debt. | GermanyShow detailsHide detailsTutao GmbH, Deisterstr. 17a, 30449 Hanover, Germany. Registered at the District Court of Hanover, HRB 208014. |
| Independent security audit | Cure53 2017Show audit detailsHide audit detailsPosteo web application, including Calendar and Notes (a separate, earlier Cure53 test in April 2015 covered Crypto Mail Storage specifically) | None on record |
| Source code | Partly open source | Fully open source |
| Zero-access encryption | Yes | Yes |
| Intra-provider E2EE | No | Yes |
| External PGP | Native | Not supported |
| Past data breach | No | No |
| Telemetry | No telemetry | No telemetry |
| Features | ||
| Hosting | Cloud | Cloud |
| Custom domain support | No | Yes |
| Aliases | Limited | Limited |
| Anti-spam approach | Described by Posteo only as a 'highly efficient spam and virus filter' — no further technical methodology is publicly documented. | SPF, DKIM, DMARC and MTA-STS harden the infrastructure against phishing and spam at the protocol level; Tuta blocks external content (images, videos) in emails by default and warns when the technical sender differs from the visible From address, without scanning encrypted message content. |
| Bundled services | CalendarAddress BookNotes | CalendarDrive |
