PrivacyPick

Private Authenticator Apps 2026

Apps that generate the one-time codes for two-factor login. Each app stores a secret for every account you add, and whoever holds those secrets can generate your codes. For each of the 5 we reviewed, we look at who can read the secrets, where the backup goes and whose key protects it, what account or phone number the app asks for, whether you can export your codes, and who pays for the development.

Ente Auth logo
8.0
out of 10

Ente Technologies, Inc. · United States

Vendor Cloud BackupOpen-Source ClientEncrypted SyncNo Account NeededDesktop AppsWeb App
2FAS logo
7.1
out of 10

Two Factor Authentication Service, Inc. · United States

Your Cloud BackupNo AccountBrowser ExtensionOwn-Cloud Backup
Authy logo
3.9
out of 10

Twilio Inc. · United States

Vendor Cloud BackupPhone Number RequiredPassword-Encrypted BackupNo Export

Don't see the authenticator app you use?

The authenticator rating rubric

Every authenticator app is scored out of 10 against five weighted categories. Who can read the secrets behind your codes carries the most weight, and a synced backup is not counted as a plus on its own.

Secret Custody & Recovery — 30%Account & Metadata Privacy — 20%Transparency & Verifiability — 20%Usability, Portability & Platforms — 20%Funding & Sustainability — 10%
  • Secret Custody & Recovery — 30%

    Who can read the secrets behind your codes, whether a backup exists, where it goes, whether it is on by default and whose key protects it, how the secrets are protected on the phone, and what happens when the phone is lost. An app where the vendor can read the secrets cannot score high here.

  • Account & Metadata Privacy — 20%

    Whether the app works without an account, what it asks for (an email address, a phone number), and what it reports about you through telemetry.

  • Transparency & Verifiability — 20%

    Whether the code is open, whether builds can be reproduced, whether an independent audit exists and who paid for it, a bug bounty, and past incidents.

  • Usability, Portability & Platforms — 20%

    Whether you can take your codes with you (export formats, import from other apps), whether one set of codes works on several devices, which platforms and code types are covered, and how well the app works day to day.

  • Funding & Sustainability — 10%

    Who pays for development, whether the app is likely to be maintained, and whether the price, where there is one, is clear. Most authenticators are free, so price alone does not separate them.

Reading the scores

An authenticator is only as private as the place its secrets live. Secret Custody & Recovery therefore comes first: it asks who can read the secrets, whether a backup exists, where it goes and whose key protects it, and what happens when the phone is lost. Account & Metadata Privacy asks what the app wants in exchange: an account, an email address or a phone number, and what it reports about you. Transparency & Verifiability asks whether the code is open and whether an audit exists and who paid for it. Usability, Portability & Platforms asks whether you can take your codes with you if you leave.

Is a synced backup better than none?

Not by itself. A backup protects you from losing access to your accounts, but a copy on the vendor's servers widens the circle of those who could read the secrets. The reviews show both sides: whether a backup exists, where it goes, whether it is on by default and whose key protects it.

What if there is no audit?

Some apps, especially community projects, have none. A missing audit is not scored anywhere else: it only limits how much Transparency & Verifiability can earn, and the review says plainly that none exists.

Missing an app?

Tell us what you could not find. Every suggestion goes onto our list of products to review.

This opens a message in your email app, addressed to hello@privacypick.com. Nothing is sent until you press send there.