Gecko engine
Gecko engine
9 private browsers reviewed and ranked by our team. We check open-source status, anti-fingerprinting defenses, telemetry, and independent audits — then rate them honestly.
Open Source: the full browser source is publicly available and independently auditable — not just a partially-open core with proprietary components on top
Chromium-Free: not built on Google's Chromium — an independent engine (Gecko/WebKit-based or other), so it doesn't inherit Chromium's upstream direction
No Telemetry: the build ships with no usage or diagnostic data collection at all — not merely collection that's switched on by default but can be turned off
Mobile Available: an official build exists for Android or iOS — not just desktop
No browsers match this filter.
Every browser is scored out of 10 against five weighted categories. Tracker blocking and fingerprinting resistance are separate axes, not one number.
What is protected out of the box with nothing configured: trackers, third-party cookies, referrer, default search, telemetry.
Real-world resistance to canvas, WebGL, font and screen fingerprinting, judged against independent tests rather than vendor claims.
Open-source status, how fresh any independent audit is, past privacy incidents and how the vendor handled them, and who funds the project.
Whether real sites break, whether DRM video works, and the learning curve for someone who is not technical.
Platform coverage, and whether sync exists and is end-to-end encrypted.
Most of a browser's rating comes down to two things that are easy to confuse. One is what it blocks with nothing configured — third-party cookies, cross-site trackers, the referrer header, a profiling default search engine, telemetry home. The other is fingerprinting resistance: how hard a site has to work to pick your exact browser out of a crowd using canvas rendering, installed fonts, window size and the many other traits a page can read. Blocking trackers and resisting fingerprinting are different problems, and a browser can be good at one while weak at the other, so they get their own scores instead of being averaged into a single "privacy" figure.
Around those sit three more. Transparency asks whether the code is fully open and auditable, how recent an independent security review is, how the vendor responded to past privacy missteps, and where the funding comes from. Usability asks whether ordinary sites break, whether protected video plays, and how much a non-technical person has to learn. The last looks at how many platforms are covered and whether sync — if it exists — is end-to-end encrypted. Weight tips toward open code and a recent audit over a long feature list.
Scoring is anchored to independent test results rather than vendor wording, and a browser with no formal audit is not penalised for that one gap — the transparency score reflects the full picture. The per-category numbers are laid out in an Our Rating table on each review, applying the weights above.
They address different things. A private browser constrains what the sites you visit can piece together about you. A VPN conceals your traffic from the network operator and your internet provider and relocates where you appear to connect from. One does not substitute for the other, and this explainer walks through exactly where the boundary is.
Engine lineage is a structural fact, not a grade. A Chromium-based browser follows Google's upstream engine decisions; a Gecko- or WebKit-based one does not. Strong entries on this list exist on both sides — what separates them is what the vendor layers on top. Use the Chromium-free filter if staying off that upstream is a firm requirement for you.